Transaction Details
Transaction Hash:
0x46
6e10ee80c116b101a465ff64e925cd8838556c6a8c43287c72424dd60f
71b3
Status:
Success
Block:
19856851
Finalized
Timestamp:
2024-05-12 22:14:35 +0000 UTC
From:
0xa903C0…79a44C
benbodhi.eth
Interacted With:
Contract
- Transfer 0.00048599 ETH From 0x6f3E62…79223d To benouna.eth
Value:
0 ETH
0.00 ETH
Transaction Fee:
0.00054350 ETH
0.00 ETH
Effective Gas Price:
4.75697446 GWei
Execution Stats:
Used
114254
out of
121644
Gas
(94%)
Gas Fees:
Base Block Fee:
3.02751256 GWei
|
Max Overall Fee:
8.27053810 GWei
|
Max Priority Fee:
1.72946189 GWei
Attributes:
Txn Type: 2 (EIP-1559)
Nonce: 2095
Block Position: 38
Call Data:
Address:
Name:
VoteCast(address indexed voter, uint256 proposalId, uint8 support, uint256 votes, string reason)
Topics:
0 | 0xb8e138887d0aa13bab447e82de9d5c1777041ecd21ca36ba824ff1e6c07ddda4 |
---|---|
1 | 0x000000000000000000000000a903c06bf35286f6d1cdad25396748353979a44c |
Data (Decoded):
proposalId | uint256 |
536
|
---|---|---|
reason | string |
I def support auditing this.
And as Joel mentioned it would be cool to see more discussion/modelling around potential outcomes and projections beyond what we’ve seen already.
+1
> memes w dreams
+1
> audit funding lgtm
+1
> ⌐◨-◨
+1
> I support this audit but in my opinion we should also fund a separate game theory / tokenomics audit on this. I have not seen sufficient discussion about how this will affect auction and arbitrage behavior.
|
support | uint8 |
1
|
voter | address | |
votes | uint256 |
1
|
Data (Hex):
Type Trace Address | From | To | Value | Gas Limit |
---|