Transaction Details

Transaction Hash:
0x46 6e10ee80c116b101a465ff64e925cd8838556c6a8c43287c72424dd60f 71b3
Status:
Success
Block:
19856851 Finalized
Timestamp:
2024-05-12 22:14:35 +0000 UTC
From:
0xa903C0…79a44C
benbodhi.eth
Interacted With:
Value:
0 ETH 0.00 ETH
Transaction Fee:
0.00054350 ETH 0.00 ETH
Effective Gas Price:
4.75697446 GWei
Execution Stats:
Used 114254 out of 121644 Gas (94%)
Gas Fees:
Base Block Fee: 3.02751256 GWei | Max Overall Fee: 8.27053810 GWei | Max Priority Fee: 1.72946189 GWei
Attributes:
Txn Type: 2 (EIP-1559)
Nonce: 2095
Block Position: 38
Call Data:
Name:
VoteCast(address indexed voter, uint256 proposalId, uint8 support, uint256 votes, string reason)
Topics:
0 0xb8e138887d0aa13bab447e82de9d5c1777041ecd21ca36ba824ff1e6c07ddda4
1 0x000000000000000000000000a903c06bf35286f6d1cdad25396748353979a44c
Data (Decoded):
proposalId uint256
536
reason string
I def support auditing this. And as Joel mentioned it would be cool to see more discussion/modelling around potential outcomes and projections beyond what we’ve seen already. +1 > memes w dreams +1 > audit funding lgtm +1 > ⌐◨-◨ +1 > I support this audit but in my opinion we should also fund a separate game theory / tokenomics audit on this. I have not seen sufficient discussion about how this will affect auction and arbitrage behavior.
support uint8
1
voter address
votes uint256
1
Data (Hex):